DPP v Mary Kelly [2011] IECCA 25 (25 February 2011)

DPP v Mary Kelly [2011] IECCA 25 (25 February 2011)

The trial was not safe or satisfactory because the trial judge misdirected the jury by applying an immediacy requirement from the unamended statute, failed to clarify the effect of the statutory amendment, and did not properly explain whether the issue was a matter of law or fact, resulting in confusion and denying...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] IECCA 25
Parties
Prosecutor: THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS; Applicant: MARY KELLY
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
25 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
conviction quashed, no re-trial ordered
Legal Topics
Criminal Damage, Lawful Excuse, Statutory Interpretation, Jury Directions
Criminal Law Criminal Damage Lawful Excuse Statutory Interpretation Jury Directions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

Prosecutor

MARY KELLY

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge misdirected the jury on the defence of lawful excuse under the Criminal Damage Act, 1991 as amended
  2. 2 Whether the trial was unsatisfactory due to confusion over statutory amendments and the applicant's self-representation

Ratio Decidendi

The trial was not safe or satisfactory because the trial judge misdirected the jury by applying an immediacy requirement from the unamended statute, failed to clarify the effect of the statutory amendment, and did not properly explain whether the issue was a matter of law or fact, resulting in confusion and denying the applicant a fair trial.

Court Disposition

conviction quashed, no re-trial ordered

Orders

  • appeal allowed
  • conviction quashed