McD. v. Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse & Anor [2003] IEHC 160 (7 February 2003)

McD. v. Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse & Anor [2003] IEHC 160 (7 February 2003)

The applicant failed to establish good reason for the delay in seeking leave for judicial review. The delay was not justified by his personal circumstances, actions, or legal advice. The nature of the impugned decision—a time limit imposed by the Commission—made prompt action essential. The court exercised its discretion to set aside leave, finding that the delay would prejudice the respondents and potentially those against whom allegations may be made.

Citation
[2003] IEHC 160
Parties
Applicant: McD; First Respondent: Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse; Second Respondent: Investigating Committee
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
07 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application to Discharge Leave for Judicial Review
Outcome
Leave to apply for judicial review set aside; application dismissed.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Procedural Fairness, Legitimate Expectation, Delay in Judicial Review, Natural and Constitutional Justice
Administrative Law Judicial Review Extension of Time Procedural Fairness Legitimate Expectation Delay in Judicial Review Natural and Constitutional Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

McD

Applicant

Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse

First Respondent

Investigating Committee

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application to Discharge Leave for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated good reason for delay in seeking leave for judicial review
  2. 2 Whether leave to apply for judicial review should be set aside due to delay
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's personal circumstances and actions constitute good reason to extend time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to establish good reason for the delay in seeking leave for judicial review. The delay was not justified by his personal circumstances, actions, or legal advice. The nature of the impugned decision—a time limit imposed by the Commission—made prompt action essential. The court exercised its discretion to set aside leave, finding that the delay would prejudice the respondents and potentially those against whom allegations may be made.

Court Disposition

Leave to apply for judicial review set aside; application dismissed.

Orders

  • Order discharging leave granted to applicant for judicial review.
  • Application for extension of time refused.