Sutcliffe Irl/ National Catering [1994] IECA 275 (4th February, 1994)
The amended agreement, including revised non-compete clauses, does not offend Section 4(1) as the restrictions are limited to what is necessary for the transfer of goodwill and do not restrict competition in the relevant market.
- Citation
- [1994] IECA 275
- Parties
- Purchaser: Sutcliffe Ireland Limited; Vendor: Michael Mac Cormac; Vendor: Brian Devlin; Vendor: Vincent Poklewski-Koziell; Vendor: Edward Redden
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification Decision / Final Decision and Certificate Issued
- Outcome
- Certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Mergers and Acquisitions, Non Compete Clauses, Market Definition, Anti Competitive Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sutcliffe Ireland Limited
Purchaser
Michael Mac Cormac
Vendor
Brian Devlin
Vendor
Vincent Poklewski-Koziell
Vendor
Edward Redden
Vendor
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification Decision / Final Decision and Certificate Issued
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the sale and purchase agreement for Rushmore, including non-compete clauses, offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991?
- 2 Are the parties undertakings within the meaning of the Act?
- 3 Is the relevant market definition appropriate for assessing competition effects?
Ratio Decidendi
The amended agreement, including revised non-compete clauses, does not offend Section 4(1) as the restrictions are limited to what is necessary for the transfer of goodwill and do not restrict competition in the relevant market.
Court Disposition
Certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement of 11 May 1993, as amended by the Supplemental Agreement of 31 January 1994, does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment