Messrs A, B & C and NAMA (FOI Act 2014) [2016] IEIC 150430 (25 October 2016)

Messrs A, B & C and NAMA (FOI Act 2014) [2016] IEIC 150430 (25 October 2016)

The review was discontinued because the number and nature of records sought would cause substantial and unreasonable interference with or disruption of the work of the Office, and the applicants did not reduce the scope of their request.

Citation
[2016] IEIC 150430
Parties
Applicant: Messrs A, B & C; Respondent: NAMA
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
25 October 2016
Procedural Posture
FOI Review / Discontinuance of Review
Outcome
review discontinued
Legal Topics
FOI Act 2014, Review Discontinuance, Substantial Interference
Administrative Law Freedom of Information FOI Act 2014 Review Discontinuance Substantial Interference

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Messrs A, B & C

Applicant

NAMA

Respondent

Procedural Posture

FOI Review / Discontinuance of Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the review should be discontinued under section 22(9)(a)(vii) of the FOI Act due to substantial and unreasonable interference with the work of the Office

Ratio Decidendi

The review was discontinued because the number and nature of records sought would cause substantial and unreasonable interference with or disruption of the work of the Office, and the applicants did not reduce the scope of their request.

Court Disposition

review discontinued

Orders

  • Review discontinued pursuant to section 22(9)(a)(vii) of the FOI Act.