Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd v Data Protection Commission & Ors; Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd v Data Protection Commission (Approved) [2024] IEHC 75 (13 February 2024)
Mr. Schrems is uniquely and directly affected by the outcome of these proceedings due to the genesis of the Own Volition Inquiry in his complaint, his active participation in related inquiries and judicial reviews, and the direct impact of any relief granted on the progress and outcome of his Complaint Based Inquiry. The effect on his rights is more than precedential; it is direct and unique, warranting his joinder as a notice party.
- Citation
- [2024] IEHC 75
- Parties
- Applicant: Meta Platforms Ireland Limited; Respondent: Data Protection Commission; Respondent: Ireland; Respondent: Attorney General; Notice Party: Maximilian Schrems
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal and Judicial Review / Application for Joinder of Notice Party
- Outcome
- Order joining Maximilian Schrems as a notice party in the proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- GDPR Compliance, Data Transfers, Notice Party Joinder, Fair Procedures, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Meta Platforms Ireland Limited
Applicant
Data Protection Commission
Respondent
Ireland
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Maximilian Schrems
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal and Judicial Review / Application for Joinder of Notice Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Maximilian Schrems should be joined as a notice party in proceedings challenging the Data Protection Commission's decision on Meta's data transfers
- 2 Whether Mr. Schrems is 'directly affected' by the outcome of the proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Mr. Schrems is uniquely and directly affected by the outcome of these proceedings due to the genesis of the Own Volition Inquiry in his complaint, his active participation in related inquiries and judicial reviews, and the direct impact of any relief granted on the progress and outcome of his Complaint Based Inquiry. The effect on his rights is more than precedential; it is direct and unique, warranting his joinder as a notice party.
Court Disposition
Order joining Maximilian Schrems as a notice party in the proceedings.
Orders
- Mr. Schrems is joined as a notice party.
- Costs to be determined at conclusion of substantive hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment