Campbell v. O'Donnell & Ors [2005] IEHC 266 (26 July 2005)
A claim against the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland for damages arising from a road traffic accident is a 'civil action' within the meaning of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003, and is not excluded by section 4(1)(i). Therefore, the plaintiff was required to apply to the Personal Injuries Assessment Board and obtain authorisation before issuing proceedings.
- Citation
- [2005] IEHC 266
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Michael Campbell; Defendant: Padraig O'Donnell; Defendant: Gavin Boyle; Defendant: Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland; Notice Party: Minister for Transport
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim Arising From Road Traffic Accident / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Proceedings misconceived and ought to be dismissed for lack of prior application to the Personal Injuries Assessment Board.
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003, Motor Insurers Bureau Liability, Road Traffic Act 1961, Civil Action Definition, Procedural Requirements for Personal Injury Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Campbell
Plaintiff
Padraig O'Donnell
Defendant
Gavin Boyle
Defendant
Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland
Defendant
Minister for Transport
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim Arising From Road Traffic Accident / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a claim against the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland require prior application to the Personal Injuries Assessment Board under the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003?
- 2 Is an action against the Bureau a 'civil action' within the meaning of the Act?
- 3 Does the statutory exclusion in section 4(1)(i) of the Act apply to claims against the Bureau?
Ratio Decidendi
A claim against the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland for damages arising from a road traffic accident is a 'civil action' within the meaning of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003, and is not excluded by section 4(1)(i). Therefore, the plaintiff was required to apply to the Personal Injuries Assessment Board and obtain authorisation before issuing proceedings.
Court Disposition
Proceedings misconceived and ought to be dismissed for lack of prior application to the Personal Injuries Assessment Board.
Orders
- Plaintiff not entitled to issue proceedings without authorisation from the Personal Injuries Assessment Board.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment