Hoey v Waterways Ireland (Unapproved) [2021] IESC 34 (28 May 2021)

Hoey v Waterways Ireland (Unapproved) [2021] IESC 34 (28 May 2021)

There was no reasonably arguable case that Waterways Ireland acted illegally; statutory authority clearly permitted removal, storage, and disposal of the barge. The plaintiff failed to show damages were inadequate or that the balance of convenience favored an injunction. Delay and lack of urgency further undermined the application. The High Court was correct to refuse interlocutory relief.

Citation
[2021] IESC 34
Parties
Plaintiff: Michael Hoey; Defendant: Waterways Ireland
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
28 May 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Refusal of Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court order refusing interlocutory injunction upheld.
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Mandatory Injunctions, Prohibitory Injunctions, Adequacy of Damages, Balance of Convenience, Standing (locus Standi), Statutory Interpretation, Waterways Regulation
Civil Procedure Equity Administrative Law Interlocutory Injunctions Mandatory Injunctions Prohibitory Injunctions Adequacy of Damages Balance of Convenience +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 26 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Hoey

Plaintiff

Waterways Ireland

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Refusal of Interlocutory Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in refusing interlocutory injunctive relief to restrain Waterways Ireland from disposing of the plaintiff's barge and to compel maintenance of waterways.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff established a fair bona fide question to be tried justifying interlocutory relief.
  3. 3 Whether damages would be an adequate remedy in lieu of injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

There was no reasonably arguable case that Waterways Ireland acted illegally; statutory authority clearly permitted removal, storage, and disposal of the barge. The plaintiff failed to show damages were inadequate or that the balance of convenience favored an injunction. Delay and lack of urgency further undermined the application. The High Court was correct to refuse interlocutory relief.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court order refusing interlocutory injunction upheld.