O'Callaghan v Ireland & Anor (Approved) [2020] IECA 180 (06 July 2020)
There is no cause of action for damages for miscarriage of justice outside the Criminal Procedure Act, 1993; the State's obligation is to provide a fair legal system including appellate remedies, not to guarantee a perfect trial at first instance. The delays in the appellant's appeal, while systemic, were not so egregious, unreasonable, or culpable as to constitute a breach of the right to trial with reasonable expedition warranting damages. The claim under s.3(2) of the ECHR Act, 2003 was statute-barred and no valid extension of time was justified.
- Citation
- [2020] IECA 180
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael O’Callaghan; Respondents: Ireland and the Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Miscarriage of Justice, Right to Trial With Reasonable Expedition, Judicial Immunity, Compensation for Wrongful Conviction, Systemic Court Delay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael O’Callaghan
Appellant
Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to damages for miscarriage of justice outside the Criminal Procedure Act, 1993
- 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to damages for breach of the right to trial with reasonable expedition under the Constitution or ECHR
- 3 Whether systemic delays in the appellate process amount to a compensable breach of rights
Ratio Decidendi
There is no cause of action for damages for miscarriage of justice outside the Criminal Procedure Act, 1993; the State's obligation is to provide a fair legal system including appellate remedies, not to guarantee a perfect trial at first instance. The delays in the appellant's appeal, while systemic, were not so egregious, unreasonable, or culpable as to constitute a breach of the right to trial with reasonable expedition warranting damages. The claim under s.3(2) of the ECHR Act, 2003 was statute-barred and no valid extension of time was justified.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed
Orders
- No damages awarded to appellant for miscarriage of justice or breach of right to trial with reasonable expedition.
- Respondents' cross-appeal on extension of time for ECHR Act claim allowed; claim under s.3(2) ECHR Act dismissed as statute-barred.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment