O'Callaghan v Ireland (Approved) [2021] IESC 68 (30 September 2021)

O'Callaghan v Ireland (Approved) [2021] IESC 68 (30 September 2021)

The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeal's framework for assessing systemic delay, holding that while there was evidence of systemic delay in the Court of Criminal Appeal due to insufficient judicial resources, the applicant's own conduct (delay in amending grounds, failure to apply for bail or priority) and absence of comparator evidence precluded a finding of breach of constitutional right warranting damages. The delay was borderline but not unreasonable in the circumstances.

Citation
[2021] IESC 68
Parties
Applicant: Michael O’Callaghan; Respondent: Ireland; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
30 September 2021
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Damages Claim for Systemic Delay in Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Court of Appeal Affirming High Court Dismissal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court and Court of Appeal judgments affirmed; no damages awarded.
Legal Topics
Systemic Delay, Right to Trial With Due Expedition, Damages for Breach of Constitutional Rights, Article 38 Constitution, Article 6 ECHR, Judicial Resources, Miscarriage of Justice
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Human Rights Law Systemic Delay Right to Trial With Due Expedition Damages for Breach of Constitutional Rights Article 38 Constitution Article 6 ECHR +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 28 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael O’Callaghan

Applicant

Ireland

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Damages Claim for Systemic Delay in Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Court of Appeal Affirming High Court Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether systemic delay in criminal appeal breached applicant's constitutional right to trial with due expedition under Article 38
  2. 2 Whether applicant entitled to damages for breach of constitutional right
  3. 3 Whether applicant's conduct contributed to delay and precluded relief

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeal's framework for assessing systemic delay, holding that while there was evidence of systemic delay in the Court of Criminal Appeal due to insufficient judicial resources, the applicant's own conduct (delay in amending grounds, failure to apply for bail or priority) and absence of comparator evidence precluded a finding of breach of constitutional right warranting damages. The delay was borderline but not unreasonable in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court and Court of Appeal judgments affirmed; no damages awarded.

Orders

  • No damages awarded to applicant
  • No finding of breach of constitutional right