Prendergast -v- Mc Laughlin [2009] IEHC 250 (20 May 2009)
The plaintiff’s cause of action, whether in contract, quasi-contract, or equity, subsisted at the time of the deceased’s death because the breach (failure to execute a will bequeathing the lands) could only have occurred during the deceased’s lifetime. Therefore, the claim is subject to the two-year limitation period under section 9(2)(b) of the Civil Liability Act 1961. As proceedings were not commenced within two years of death, the claim is statute barred.
- Citation
- [2009] IEHC 250
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Michael Prendergast; Defendant: Neil McLaughlin
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Probate/estates / Preliminary Issue on Statute of Limitations
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim is statute barred and cannot proceed.
- Legal Topics
- Statute of Limitations, Constructive Trust, Promissory Estoppel, Survival of Actions, Limitation Periods, Breach of Promise to Bequeath
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Prendergast
Plaintiff
Neil McLaughlin
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Probate/estates / Preliminary Issue on Statute of Limitations
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff’s claim against the estate is statute barred under section 9 of the Civil Liability Act 1961 and the Statute of Limitations Act 1957 as amended
- 2 Whether the cause of action subsisted at the time of death or arose only upon death in the context of a promise to bequeath property
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff’s cause of action, whether in contract, quasi-contract, or equity, subsisted at the time of the deceased’s death because the breach (failure to execute a will bequeathing the lands) could only have occurred during the deceased’s lifetime. Therefore, the claim is subject to the two-year limitation period under section 9(2)(b) of the Civil Liability Act 1961. As proceedings were not commenced within two years of death, the claim is statute barred.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim is statute barred and cannot proceed.
Orders
- Plaintiff’s claim dismissed as statute barred under section 9(2)(b) of the Civil Liability Act 1961.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment