Reilly v Iconic Newspaper Ltd (Approved) [2021] IEHC 490 (13 July 2021)
There was no evidence upon which a jury could reasonably find that the article was not a fair and accurate report of the court proceedings; the defence of absolute privilege applies as a matter of law, and the case must be withdrawn from the jury.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 490
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Michael Reilly; Defendant: Iconic Newspaper Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Ruling on Application to Withdraw Case From Jury at Conclusion of Evidence
- Outcome
- Case withdrawn from jury; judgment for defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Absolute Privilege, Fair and Accurate Reporting, Defamation Act 2009, Jury Withdrawal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Reilly
Plaintiff
Iconic Newspaper Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Ruling on Application to Withdraw Case From Jury at Conclusion of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the article constituted a fair and accurate report of court proceedings
- 2 Whether the defence of absolute privilege under s.17(2)(i) of the Defamation Act 2009 applies
- 3 Whether there was any evidence upon which a jury could reasonably find for the plaintiff
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence upon which a jury could reasonably find that the article was not a fair and accurate report of the court proceedings; the defence of absolute privilege applies as a matter of law, and the case must be withdrawn from the jury.
Court Disposition
Case withdrawn from jury; judgment for defendant.
Orders
- Case withdrawn from jury
- Plaintiff's action fails
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment