Ring v. A.G. [2004] IEHC 14 (20 February 2004)
There is no constitutionally guaranteed right to stand for election to a local authority; s. 13A does not interfere with the right to stand for election to Dáil Éireann; s. 13A does not infringe the constitutional guarantee of equality, and any interference is proportionate and justified.
- Citation
- [2004] IEHC 14
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Michael Ring; Defendant: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Challenge / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's challenge dismissed; s. 13A upheld as constitutional.
- Legal Topics
- Dual Mandate, Local Government, Eligibility for Election, Equality Before the Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Ring
Plaintiff
Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Challenge / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s. 13A of the Local Government Act, 2001 (as inserted by s. 2 of the Local Government (No. 2) Act, 2003) is unconstitutional
- 2 Whether there is a constitutionally guaranteed right to stand for election to a local authority
- 3 Whether s. 13A interferes with the right to stand for election to Dáil Éireann
Ratio Decidendi
There is no constitutionally guaranteed right to stand for election to a local authority; s. 13A does not interfere with the right to stand for election to Dáil Éireann; s. 13A does not infringe the constitutional guarantee of equality, and any interference is proportionate and justified.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's challenge dismissed; s. 13A upheld as constitutional.
Orders
- Section 13A of the Local Government Act, 2001 (as inserted by s. 2 of the Local Government (No. 2) Act, 2003) is valid and constitutional.
- No relief granted to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment