Thornton -v- Timlin [2012] IEHC 239 (13 June 2012)

Thornton -v- Timlin [2012] IEHC 239 (13 June 2012)

The bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' is void for uncertainty as the intended beneficiaries cannot be identified from the will or admissible extrinsic evidence; the failed bequest falls into the residuary estate under s. 91 of the Succession Act 1965.

Citation
[2012] IEHC 239
Parties
Plaintiff: Michael Thornton; Defendant: Michael Timlin
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
13 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Special Summons (probate) / High Court Judgment
Outcome
Bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' declared void for uncertainty; amount falls into residue.
Legal Topics
Construction of Wills, Uncertainty in Bequests, Void Gifts, Residuary Clauses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Thornton

Plaintiff

Michael Timlin

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Special Summons (probate) / High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' is valid or void for uncertainty
  2. 2 Whether extrinsic evidence can clarify the intended beneficiaries
  3. 3 Consequence of void bequest under the Succession Act 1965

Ratio Decidendi

The bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' is void for uncertainty as the intended beneficiaries cannot be identified from the will or admissible extrinsic evidence; the failed bequest falls into the residuary estate under s. 91 of the Succession Act 1965.

Court Disposition

Bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' declared void for uncertainty; amount falls into residue.

Orders

  • Pecuniary bequest of IR£500 to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' is void for uncertainty and included in the residuary estate.