Thornton -v- Timlin [2012] IEHC 239 (13 June 2012)
The bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' is void for uncertainty as the intended beneficiaries cannot be identified from the will or admissible extrinsic evidence; the failed bequest falls into the residuary estate under s. 91 of the Succession Act 1965.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 239
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Michael Thornton; Defendant: Michael Timlin
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Special Summons (probate) / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' declared void for uncertainty; amount falls into residue.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Wills, Uncertainty in Bequests, Void Gifts, Residuary Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Thornton
Plaintiff
Michael Timlin
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Special Summons (probate) / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' is valid or void for uncertainty
- 2 Whether extrinsic evidence can clarify the intended beneficiaries
- 3 Consequence of void bequest under the Succession Act 1965
Ratio Decidendi
The bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' is void for uncertainty as the intended beneficiaries cannot be identified from the will or admissible extrinsic evidence; the failed bequest falls into the residuary estate under s. 91 of the Succession Act 1965.
Court Disposition
Bequest to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' declared void for uncertainty; amount falls into residue.
Orders
- Pecuniary bequest of IR£500 to 'Mayo County Council (Ballina area) workers' is void for uncertainty and included in the residuary estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment