Agrama -v- Minister for Justice & anor [2016] IECA 72 (22 February 2016)

Agrama -v- Minister for Justice & anor [2016] IECA 72 (22 February 2016)

The application was based on a fundamental misconception that investigation and prosecution are mutually exclusive; evidence gathering for investigation may overlap with proceedings; no evidence investigation had closed; leave for judicial review refused.

Citation
[2016] IECA 72
Parties
Applicant/appellant: Frank Agrama; Respondent: Minister for Justice and Equality; Respondent: District Judge O'Neill
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
22 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court Refusal of Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; leave to seek judicial review refused.
Legal Topics
Evidence Gathering, International Cooperation, Statute of Limitations, Abuse of Process
Criminal Law Mutual Legal Assistance Judicial Review Evidence Gathering International Cooperation Statute of Limitations Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frank Agrama

Applicant/appellant

Minister for Justice and Equality

Respondent

District Judge O'Neill

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court Refusal of Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether evidence sought under mutual legal assistance is for investigation or prosecution
  2. 2 Whether Minister had jurisdiction to nominate judge to receive evidence
  3. 3 Whether application for judicial review was out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The application was based on a fundamental misconception that investigation and prosecution are mutually exclusive; evidence gathering for investigation may overlap with proceedings; no evidence investigation had closed; leave for judicial review refused.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; leave to seek judicial review refused.

Orders

  • Decision of High Court upheld; leave to seek judicial review refused.