Minister for Justice & Equality -v- Nolan [2012] IEHC 249 (24 May 2012)
The respondent's continued detention under an indeterminate sentence for public protection in the UK, after expiry of the punitive tariff, constitutes purely preventative detention, which is unconstitutional under Article 40.4 of the Irish Constitution. Surrender is prohibited by Section 37(1) of the European Arrest...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 249
- Parties
- Applicant: Minister for Justice and Equality; Respondent: Gavin Nolan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition (european Arrest Warrant) / Final Judgment on Surrender
- Outcome
- surrender refused
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Preventative Detention, Imprisonment for Public Protection, Constitutional Prohibition, Article 40.4, Article 5 ECHR, Correspondence of Offences, Minimum Gravity, Surrender Refusal Criteria
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minister for Justice and Equality
Applicant
Gavin Nolan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Extradition (european Arrest Warrant) / Final Judgment on Surrender
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether surrender under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 is prohibited due to the preventative nature of the UK sentence
- 2 Whether the respondent's continued detention would contravene Article 40.4 of the Constitution and/or Article 5 ECHR
- 3 Whether the UK sentence corresponds to an Irish offence and meets minimum gravity requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's continued detention under an indeterminate sentence for public protection in the UK, after expiry of the punitive tariff, constitutes purely preventative detention, which is unconstitutional under Article 40.4 of the Irish Constitution. Surrender is prohibited by Section 37(1) of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003, as the nature of the UK sentence is unknown and impermissible in this jurisdiction. The requirements for correspondence and minimum gravity are met, but constitutional prohibition prevails.
Court Disposition
surrender refused
Orders
- The respondent shall not be surrendered to the United Kingdom under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003.
- Any further orders regarding bail or detention are to be determined separately.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment