D.T. -v- The Rufugee Appeals Tribunal & anor [2017] IESC 45 (14 June 2017)

The appeal is dismissed because the certified point of law cannot be determined without resolving significant conflicts of evidence regarding the applicant's nationality and statelessness, which would require a plenary hearing. The court cannot decide a hypothetical legal question based on disputed facts.

Citation: [2017] IESC 45
Parties: Applicant/appellant: D. T.; Respondent: Minister for Justice and Law Reform; Respondent: Refugee Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction: Ireland
Judgment Date: 14 June 2017
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Statelessness, Nationality Determination, Abuse of Process, Judicial Review, Credibility Assessment

Immigration Refugee Law Administrative Law Statelessness Nationality Determination Abuse of Process Judicial Review Credibility Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2

Parties

D. T.

Applicant/appellant

Minister for Justice and Law Reform

Respondent

Refugee Appeals Tribunal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant is stateless or a Nepalese national
2 Whether proceedings should be dismissed for abuse of process due to conflicting evidence
3 Appropriateness of determining a certified point of law based on disputed facts

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

Appeal dismissed; applicant may pursue remedies under s. 22 of the International Protection Act 2015