MK (Albania) v Minister for Justice & Equality (Approved) [2022] IESC 48_2 (24 November 2022)
The Minister's failure to conduct a proportionality analysis of the applicant's private and family life rights under the Constitution and Article 8 ECHR before making the deportation order rendered the decision unlawful, warranting the remedy of certiorari regardless of whether the substantive outcome might have been the same.
- Citation
- [2022] IESC 48_2
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: MK (Albania); Respondent: Minister for Justice & Equality
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Proportionality Analysis, Article 8 ECHR, Deportation Orders, Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness, Remedies in Administrative Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MK (Albania)
Applicant/appellant
Minister for Justice & Equality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister was required to conduct a proportionality analysis of the applicant's rights under the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights before making a deportation order
- 2 Whether the decision-making process lawfully considered the applicant's private and family life rights
- 3 Whether the remedy of certiorari is appropriate where the process was unlawful even if the substantive result might have been the same
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister's failure to conduct a proportionality analysis of the applicant's private and family life rights under the Constitution and Article 8 ECHR before making the deportation order rendered the decision unlawful, warranting the remedy of certiorari regardless of whether the substantive outcome might have been the same.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of certiorari quashing the Minister's decision
- Remit to the Minister for reconsideration in accordance with law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment