MJE v Lanigan Ruling 2013 1 EXT [2014] IEHC 702 (17 November 2014)

MJE v Lanigan Ruling 2013 1 EXT [2014] IEHC 702 (17 November 2014)

The court determined that the procedural and evidential issues raised during the section 16 hearing did not fundamentally undermine the validity of the extradition process under the European Arrest Warrant framework.

Citation
[2014] IEHC 702
Parties
Applicant: MJE; Respondent: Lanigan
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
17 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Extradition / Preliminary Ruling on Procedural and Evidential Issues During Section 16 Hearing
Outcome
preliminary ruling issued; extradition process to proceed
Legal Topics
European Arrest Warrant, Section 16 Hearing, Procedural Issues, Evidential Issues
Criminal Law Extradition Law European Arrest Warrant Section 16 Hearing Procedural Issues Evidential Issues

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MJE

Applicant

Lanigan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extradition / Preliminary Ruling on Procedural and Evidential Issues During Section 16 Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether procedural and evidential issues arising during the section 16 hearing affect the validity of the extradition process under the European Arrest Warrant framework

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the procedural and evidential issues raised during the section 16 hearing did not fundamentally undermine the validity of the extradition process under the European Arrest Warrant framework.

Court Disposition

preliminary ruling issued; extradition process to proceed