MM v The International Protection Office & Ors (Approved) [2025] IEHC 118 (05 February 2025)
Applicant is not entitled to relief by judicial review because he has an adequate alternative remedy via statutory appeal to IPAT, and no material part of his claim was omitted from consideration at first instance.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 118
- Parties
- Applicant: MM; Respondent: The International Protection Office; Respondent: Ireland; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Relief refused; judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- International Protection, Refugee Status, Statutory Appeal, Judicial Review, Country of Origin Information
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MM
Applicant
The International Protection Office
Respondent
Ireland
Respondent
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant can challenge refusal of international protection by judicial review when statutory appeal is available
- 2 Whether first respondent failed to consider risk of persecution due to Gabooye clan membership
- 3 Whether failure to consider UNHCR report constituted procedural deficiency
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant is not entitled to relief by judicial review because he has an adequate alternative remedy via statutory appeal to IPAT, and no material part of his claim was omitted from consideration at first instance.
Court Disposition
Relief refused; judicial review dismissed.
Orders
- Refusal to set aside decision of first respondent dated 15 August 2023
- Refusal to set aside decision refusing leave to remain dated 22 August 2023
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment