Failure to suppress marketing preferences by Mobile network operator [2009] IEDPC 10 (2009)
The MNO failed to promptly and effectively suppress the complainants' marketing preferences due to technical and administrative errors, constituting a breach of its obligations under Regulation 13 of SI 535 of 2003.
- Citation
- [2009] IEDPC 10
- Parties
- Complainant: Complainant 1; Complainant: Complainant 2; Respondent: Mobile Network Operator (MNO)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Data Protection Complaint / Decision by Data Protection Commissioner
- Outcome
- Warning issued to MNO; complaints resolved by apology and ex gratia payment.
- Legal Topics
- Direct Marketing, Customer Consent, Suppression of Marketing Preferences, Administrative Error, Data Processor Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Complainant 1
Complainant
Complainant 2
Complainant
Mobile Network Operator (MNO)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Data Protection Complaint / Decision by Data Protection Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the MNO failed to respect customers' requests to opt out of direct marketing communications
- 2 Whether the MNO complied with its obligations under Regulation 13 of SI 535 of 2003
Ratio Decidendi
The MNO failed to promptly and effectively suppress the complainants' marketing preferences due to technical and administrative errors, constituting a breach of its obligations under Regulation 13 of SI 535 of 2003.
Court Disposition
Warning issued to MNO; complaints resolved by apology and ex gratia payment.
Orders
- MNO to ensure marketing preference changes are recorded and updated within 48 hours.
- MNO to provide data protection training to staff and update guidance for direct marketing personnel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment