Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank -v- Hanley & anor [2015] IEHC 738 (26 November 2015)
The Circuit Court retains jurisdiction in mortgage possession proceedings where the property is not rateable or where no evidence establishes that the rateable valuation exceeds the statutory limit; formal proof of rateable valuation is not essential unless challenged and proven otherwise.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 738
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank; Defendant/appellant: Shane Hanley; Defendant/appellant: Alan Giblin
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Circuit Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Mortgage Possession, Circuit Court Jurisdiction, Rateable Valuation, Evidence Admissibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank
Plaintiff/respondent
Shane Hanley
Defendant/appellant
Alan Giblin
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Circuit Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Circuit Court had jurisdiction to grant possession absent formal proof of rateable valuation
- 2 Whether a s.67 certificate or local authority letter constitutes sufficient evidence of rateable valuation
- 3 Whether defects in affidavits affect admissibility or validity of proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Circuit Court retains jurisdiction in mortgage possession proceedings where the property is not rateable or where no evidence establishes that the rateable valuation exceeds the statutory limit; formal proof of rateable valuation is not essential unless challenged and proven otherwise.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed
Orders
- Order for possession of the property affirmed
- Ancillary relief as granted by Circuit Court affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment