Curtis v. Kenny [2001] IEHC 31; [2001] 2 IR 96 (9th March, 2001)
There was no legal or factual basis for holding the applicant in contempt or committing him to prison. The procedures adopted were a breach of natural and constitutional justice. The orders and warrant of committal were ultra vires and must be quashed. Costs are awarded against the notice parties but not against the judge, as the threshold for judicial impropriety was not met.
- Citation
- [2001] IEHC 31
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr. Curtis; Respondent: Judge Kenny; Notice Party: Mr. Higgins; Notice Party: Mr. Lynch
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Natural Justice, Judicial Review, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. Curtis
Applicant
Judge Kenny
Respondent
Mr. Higgins
Notice Party
Mr. Lynch
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully committed for contempt of court
- 2 Whether the procedures leading to committal breached standards of justice and fairness
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the judge
Ratio Decidendi
There was no legal or factual basis for holding the applicant in contempt or committing him to prison. The procedures adopted were a breach of natural and constitutional justice. The orders and warrant of committal were ultra vires and must be quashed. Costs are awarded against the notice parties but not against the judge, as the threshold for judicial impropriety was not met.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Certiorari to quash all orders and the warrant of committal against Mr. Curtis
- Costs awarded in favour of Mr. Curtis against Mr. Higgins and Mr. Lynch
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment