Curtis v. Kenny [2001] IEHC 31; [2001] 2 IR 96 (9th March, 2001)
There was no legal or factual basis for the committal of the applicant for contempt, as he was not served with a witness summons or court order. The orders and warrant were ultra vires and in breach of natural and constitutional justice and must be quashed.
- Citation
- [2001] 2 IR 96
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr. Curtis; Respondent: Judge Kenny; Notice Party: Mr. Higgins; Notice Party: Mr. Lynch
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Judicial Review, Natural Justice, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. Curtis
Applicant
Judge Kenny
Respondent
Mr. Higgins
Notice Party
Mr. Lynch
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully committed for contempt of court
- 2 Whether the orders of committal were ultra vires and in breach of natural and constitutional justice
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the judge
Ratio Decidendi
There was no legal or factual basis for the committal of the applicant for contempt, as he was not served with a witness summons or court order. The orders and warrant were ultra vires and in breach of natural and constitutional justice and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Certiorari to quash all orders and the warrant of committal against Mr. Curtis
- Costs awarded in favour of Mr. Curtis against Mr. Higgins and Mr. Lynch
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment