F.L v C.L [2006] IEHC 66 (25 January 2006)
The father acquiesced in the retention of the children in Ireland within the meaning of Article 13(a) of the Hague Convention, evidenced by his conduct and lack of objection or request for return, thus the court has discretion to refuse return and exercises it in favour of non-return, considering the interests of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] IEHC 66
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr. L.; Respondent: Mrs. L.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Hague Convention, Acquiescence, Jurisdiction, Habitual Residence, Access Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. L.
Applicant
Mrs. L.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the retention of the children in Ireland was wrongful under Article 3 of the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether the father consented or acquiesced to the retention under Article 13(a)
- 3 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to refuse return under Article 13
Ratio Decidendi
The father acquiesced in the retention of the children in Ireland within the meaning of Article 13(a) of the Hague Convention, evidenced by his conduct and lack of objection or request for return, thus the court has discretion to refuse return and exercises it in favour of non-return, considering the interests of the children and the factual circumstances.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Order refusing the father's application for return of the children to Northern Ireland under the Hague Convention and Act of 1991.
- Order for transmission of court order, judgment, pleadings, affidavits, exhibits, report of Dr. Byrne, and transcript of oral evidence to the High Court of Justice of Northern Ireland pursuant to Article 11.6 of Regulation 2201/2003.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment