Mr Q and Cork County Council [2017] IEIC 170320 (19 October 2017)
The PRNs sought constitute personal information under section 37(1) of the FOI Act, and none of the exceptions in section 37(2) or section 37(5) apply. The public interest in granting access does not outweigh the privacy rights of the individuals concerned. Therefore, Cork County Council was justified in refusing access to the PRNs.
- Citation
- [2017] IEIC 170320
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Q; Respondent: Cork County Council
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Review / Final Binding Decision by Information Commissioner
- Outcome
- Refusal affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Information Exemption, Public Interest Test, Planning Contributions, Record Creation Under FOI
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Q
Applicant
Cork County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Final Binding Decision by Information Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Cork County Council was justified in refusing access to Planning Reference Numbers (PRNs) relating to refunds of general planning contributions under section 37 of the FOI Act
Ratio Decidendi
The PRNs sought constitute personal information under section 37(1) of the FOI Act, and none of the exceptions in section 37(2) or section 37(5) apply. The public interest in granting access does not outweigh the privacy rights of the individuals concerned. Therefore, Cork County Council was justified in refusing access to the PRNs.
Court Disposition
Refusal affirmed
Orders
- Council's refusal to grant access to PRNs is affirmed under section 37(1) of the FOI Act.
- Right of appeal to the High Court within four weeks on a point of law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment