Mr R and Mayo County Council [2021] IEIC 100320 (17 February 2021)

Mr R and Mayo County Council [2021] IEIC 100320 (17 February 2021)

The Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act because it had taken all reasonable steps to locate the records and provided sufficient evidence that no further relevant records exist or can be found.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] IEIC 100320
Parties
Applicant: Mr R; Respondent: Mayo County Council
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
17 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review by Information Commissioner
Outcome
request refused (affirmed)
Legal Topics
Refusal of Access to Records, Adequacy of Search, Data Retention, GDPR Compliance
Administrative Law Freedom of Information Refusal of Access to Records Adequacy of Search Data Retention GDPR Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr R

Applicant

Mayo County Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review by Information Commissioner

  1. 1 Whether Mayo County Council was justified under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act in refusing access to further records relating to a Local Improvement Scheme on the ground that no further records exist or can be found

Ratio Decidendi

The Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act because it had taken all reasonable steps to locate the records and provided sufficient evidence that no further relevant records exist or can be found.

Court Disposition

request refused (affirmed)