Mr R and Mayo County Council [2021] IEIC 100320 (17 February 2021)
The Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act because it had taken all reasonable steps to locate the records and provided sufficient evidence that no further relevant records exist or can be found.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] IEIC 100320
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr R; Respondent: Mayo County Council
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review by Information Commissioner
- Outcome
- request refused (affirmed)
- Legal Topics
- Refusal of Access to Records, Adequacy of Search, Data Retention, GDPR Compliance
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr R
Applicant
Mayo County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review by Information Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mayo County Council was justified under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act in refusing access to further records relating to a Local Improvement Scheme on the ground that no further records exist or can be found
Ratio Decidendi
The Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act because it had taken all reasonable steps to locate the records and provided sufficient evidence that no further relevant records exist or can be found.
Court Disposition
request refused (affirmed)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment