Mr T and Defence Forces [2021] IEIC OIC-106795-Q5R6M6 (3 December 2021)

Mr T and Defence Forces [2021] IEIC OIC-106795-Q5R6M6 (3 December 2021)

Defence Forces failed to comply with section 15(4) by not properly assisting the applicant to refine the already refined request and did not provide sufficient evidence that processing would cause substantial and unreasonable interference; refusal under section 15(1)(c) was unjustified.

Citation
[2021] IEIC OIC-106795-Q5R6M6
Parties
Applicant: Mr T; Respondent: Defence Forces
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
03 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Formal Binding Decision After Internal Review and Remittal
Outcome
decision annulled
Legal Topics
FOI Refusal, Section 15(1)(c) Substantial Interference, Section 15(4) Assistance to Requester

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr T

Applicant

Defence Forces

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Freedom of Information Review / Formal Binding Decision After Internal Review and Remittal

  1. 1 Whether Defence Forces was justified in refusing FOI request under section 15(1)(c) due to substantial and unreasonable interference with its work
  2. 2 Whether Defence Forces complied with section 15(4) by offering assistance to refine the request

Ratio Decidendi

Defence Forces failed to comply with section 15(4) by not properly assisting the applicant to refine the already refined request and did not provide sufficient evidence that processing would cause substantial and unreasonable interference; refusal under section 15(1)(c) was unjustified.

Court Disposition

decision annulled

Orders

  • Defence Forces directed to process Request B afresh using proper search based on reduced individuals and timeframe
  • Defence Forces to comply within five working days after expiration of four-week appeal period