Mr X and the Irish Prison Service (FOI Act 2014) (Irish Prison Service (the IPS)) [2018] IEIC 180194 (10 July 2018)
The IPS was not entitled to refuse the request under section 15(1)(c) because it failed to comply with section 15(4) by not offering reasonable assistance to the applicant to amend the request.
- Citation
- [2018] IEIC 180194
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr X; Respondent: Irish Prison Service
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- FOI Review / Decision on Review
- Outcome
- decision annulled and remitted for fresh consideration
- Legal Topics
- FOI Refusal on Administrative Grounds, Reasonable Assistance to Requester, Section 15(1)(c) FOI Act 2014, Section 15(4) FOI Act 2014
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr X
Applicant
Irish Prison Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOI Review / Decision on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the IPS was justified in refusing the applicant's FOI request under section 15(1)(c) of the FOI Act 2014 on the ground that processing the request would cause a substantial and unreasonable interference with or disruption of its work
- 2 Whether the IPS complied with its obligation under section 15(4) to assist or offer to assist the requester to amend the request
Ratio Decidendi
The IPS was not entitled to refuse the request under section 15(1)(c) because it failed to comply with section 15(4) by not offering reasonable assistance to the applicant to amend the request.
Court Disposition
decision annulled and remitted for fresh consideration
Orders
- The decision of the IPS is annulled.
- The request is remitted to the IPS for fresh consideration in compliance with section 15(4) of the FOI Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment