Mr X and Mayo County Council (Mayo County Council) [2022] IEIC OIC-112466 (7 April 2022)
The Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act because it had taken all reasonable steps to locate the records and no evidence was presented to suggest that additional records exist.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] IEIC OIC-112466
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr X; Respondent: Mayo County Council
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- FOI Review / Final Decision by Information Commissioner
- Outcome
- request refused
- Legal Topics
- Refusal of Access to Records, Adequacy of Search, Section 15(1)(a) FOI Act, Existence of Records
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr X
Applicant
Mayo County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOI Review / Final Decision by Information Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mayo County Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the basis that no further records exist or can be found after all reasonable steps have been taken
Ratio Decidendi
The Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act because it had taken all reasonable steps to locate the records and no evidence was presented to suggest that additional records exist.
Court Disposition
request refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment