Mr X and Mayo County Council (Mayo County Council) [2022] IEIC OIC-112466 (7 April 2022)

Mr X and Mayo County Council (Mayo County Council) [2022] IEIC OIC-112466 (7 April 2022)

The Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act because it had taken all reasonable steps to locate the records and no evidence was presented to suggest that additional records exist.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] IEIC OIC-112466
Parties
Applicant: Mr X; Respondent: Mayo County Council
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
07 April 2022
Procedural Posture
FOI Review / Final Decision by Information Commissioner
Outcome
request refused
Legal Topics
Refusal of Access to Records, Adequacy of Search, Section 15(1)(a) FOI Act, Existence of Records
Freedom of Information Administrative Law Refusal of Access to Records Adequacy of Search Section 15(1)(a) FOI Act Existence of Records

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr X

Applicant

Mayo County Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

FOI Review / Final Decision by Information Commissioner

  1. 1 Whether Mayo County Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the basis that no further records exist or can be found after all reasonable steps have been taken

Ratio Decidendi

The Council was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act because it had taken all reasonable steps to locate the records and no evidence was presented to suggest that additional records exist.

Court Disposition

request refused