Mr. X and the St. Joseph's Foundation [2025] IEIC 152201 (01 July 2025)
The Information Commissioner determined that the information requested is not exempt under s.36 as the respondent failed to demonstrate sufficient prejudice or harm, and ordered disclosure.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] IEIC 152201
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr. X; Respondent: St. Joseph's Foundation
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Information Access Appeal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Commercial Sensitivity, Public Body Disclosure
Information Law Freedom of Information Commercial Sensitivity Public Body Disclosure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr. X
Applicant
St. Joseph's Foundation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Information Access Appeal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether information held by St. Joseph's Foundation is exempt from disclosure under s.36 of the Freedom of Information Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Information Commissioner determined that the information requested is not exempt under s.36 as the respondent failed to demonstrate sufficient prejudice or harm, and ordered disclosure.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- St. Joseph's Foundation is directed to release the requested information to Mr. X
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment