Mr X and TUSLA (FOI Act 2014) [2015] IEIC 150121 (20 October 2015)
Section 37(1) of the FOI Act applies as the records contain personal information of individuals other than the applicant, and no exceptions under section 37(2) or public interest override under section 37(5) apply. The applicant's interest is private, not a true public interest, and the right to privacy outweighs...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] IEIC 150121
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr X; Respondent: TUSLA
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review by Information Commissioner
- Outcome
- Refusal of access affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Access to Information, Personal Data Protection, Confidentiality, Public Interest Balancing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr X
Applicant
TUSLA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review by Information Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether TUSLA was justified in refusing access to records under sections 35 and 37 of the FOI Act 2014 on the basis of confidentiality and protection of third-party personal information
Ratio Decidendi
Section 37(1) of the FOI Act applies as the records contain personal information of individuals other than the applicant, and no exceptions under section 37(2) or public interest override under section 37(5) apply. The applicant's interest is private, not a true public interest, and the right to privacy outweighs the interest in disclosure.
Court Disposition
Refusal of access affirmed
Orders
- Decision of TUSLA to refuse access to the records is affirmed under section 37(1) of the FOI Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment