Mr X and University College Cork [2003] IEIC 020485 (4 March 2003)
UCC was justified in refusing to provide a statement of reasons under section 18 of the FOI Act for the 1999 competition because the Act does not apply retrospectively to acts occurring before UCC was prescribed as a public body. The statement of reasons provided for the 2001 competition met the requirements of section 18. UCC was also justified in refusing access to certain records containing personal information under section 28(1), but not to general comments or areas for improvement that did not identify individuals.
- Citation
- [2003] IEIC 020485
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr X; Respondent: University College Cork
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Review / Decision of the Information Commissioner Under Section 34(2) of the Freedom of Information Act, 1997
- Outcome
- Varied in part, otherwise affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Retrospective Application of Statutes, Right to Statement of Reasons, Access to Records, Personal Information Exemption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr X
Applicant
University College Cork
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Decision of the Information Commissioner Under Section 34(2) of the Freedom of Information Act, 1997
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether UCC is required to provide a statement of reasons under section 18 of the FOI Act for an act occurring before it was prescribed as a public body
- 2 Whether the statement of reasons provided for the 2001 competition meets the requirements of section 18
- 3 Whether UCC was justified in refusing access to certain records under section 28(1) (personal information)
Ratio Decidendi
UCC was justified in refusing to provide a statement of reasons under section 18 of the FOI Act for the 1999 competition because the Act does not apply retrospectively to acts occurring before UCC was prescribed as a public body. The statement of reasons provided for the 2001 competition met the requirements of section 18. UCC was also justified in refusing access to certain records containing personal information under section 28(1), but not to general comments or areas for improvement that did not identify individuals.
Court Disposition
Varied in part, otherwise affirmed
Orders
- UCC to grant access to paragraph 5 on page 3 of record 6
- UCC to grant access to paragraph 5 on page 2 of record 22
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment