Mr. Y & Tusla [2025] IEIC 154801 (30 October 2025)
Tusla was justified in redacting information under section 37(1) but was not justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a); the refusal was annulled and remitted for fresh consideration.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] IEIC 154801
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr. Y; Respondent: Tusla
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- FOI Appeal / Decision of Information Commissioner
- Outcome
- Varied
- Legal Topics
- Redaction of Records, Refusal of Access, Section 37(1) FOI Act, Section 15(1)(a) FOI Act
Administrative Law Freedom of Information Redaction of Records Refusal of Access Section 37(1) FOI Act Section 15(1)(a) FOI Act
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr. Y
Applicant
Tusla
Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOI Appeal / Decision of Information Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Tusla was justified in redacting information under section 37(1) of the FOI Act
- 2 Whether Tusla was justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act
Ratio Decidendi
Tusla was justified in redacting information under section 37(1) but was not justified in refusing access to further records under section 15(1)(a); the refusal was annulled and remitted for fresh consideration.
Court Disposition
Varied
Orders
- Redactions under section 37(1) upheld
- Refusal under section 15(1)(a) annulled and remitted for fresh consideration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment