Ms. X and Courts Service (FOI Act 2014) [2016] IEIC 150441 (16 March 2016)
Staff role profiles are personnel records containing personal information as defined by the FOI Act; redaction would not prevent identification due to small staff numbers; no public interest sufficient to override privacy rights; exemption under section 37(1) applies and no exception or override is established.
- Citation
- [2016] IEIC 150441
- Parties
- Applicant: Ms. X; Respondent: Courts Service
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- FOI Review / Decision of Information Commissioner Under Section 22(2) FOI Act 2014
- Outcome
- refusal affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Information, Public Interest Test, Exemptions Under FOI, Personnel Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms. X
Applicant
Courts Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOI Review / Decision of Information Commissioner Under Section 22(2) FOI Act 2014
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether staff role profiles are personal information under section 37(1) FOI Act 2014
- 2 Whether any exception or public interest overrides the exemption under section 37(1)
- 3 Whether redaction under section 18 would allow partial release
Ratio Decidendi
Staff role profiles are personnel records containing personal information as defined by the FOI Act; redaction would not prevent identification due to small staff numbers; no public interest sufficient to override privacy rights; exemption under section 37(1) applies and no exception or override is established.
Court Disposition
refusal affirmed
Orders
- Decision of Courts Service to refuse access to staff role profiles under section 37(1) FOI Act 2014 is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment