Ms X and Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council (FOI Act 2014) [2017] IEIC 160530 (6 March 2017)
The Council was not justified in refusing the applicant's request under section 15(1)(g) because the requests, while numerous, were not made in bad faith, did not amount to an abuse of process, and related to ongoing matters of legitimate public concern.
- Citation
- [2017] IEIC 160530
- Parties
- Applicant: Ms X; Respondent: Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- FOI Review / Decision on Review by Information Commissioner
- Outcome
- Council's refusal annulled; fresh decision required
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Requests, Pattern of Unreasonable Requests, Right of Access to Records, FOI Act 2014 Section 15(1)(g)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms X
Applicant
Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOI Review / Decision on Review by Information Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council was justified in refusing the applicant's FOI request as vexatious or as part of a pattern of manifestly unreasonable requests under section 15(1)(g) of the FOI Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Council was not justified in refusing the applicant's request under section 15(1)(g) because the requests, while numerous, were not made in bad faith, did not amount to an abuse of process, and related to ongoing matters of legitimate public concern.
Court Disposition
Council's refusal annulled; fresh decision required
Orders
- The Council's decision to refuse the request under section 15(1)(g) is annulled.
- The Council is directed to undertake a fresh decision-making process on the applicant's request in accordance with the FOI Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment