Ms X and the Health Service Executive (FOI Act 2014) [2016] IEIC 160023 (18 August 2016)
The HSE was justified in refusing to delete the entire record and in limiting amendments to the addition of clarifying statements regarding the date, diagnosis, and history, as the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence that the remainder of the record was incomplete, incorrect, or misleading.
- Citation
- [2016] IEIC 160023
- Parties
- Applicant: Ms X; Respondent: Health Service Executive
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review Under Section 22(2) of the FOI Act 2014
- Outcome
- HSE's decision varied and affirmed in part
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Amendment of Medical Records, Retrospective Record Creation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms X
Applicant
Health Service Executive
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review Under Section 22(2) of the FOI Act 2014
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the HSE was justified in refusing to amend a medical record in the manner requested by the applicant under section 9 of the FOI Act 2014
Ratio Decidendi
The HSE was justified in refusing to delete the entire record and in limiting amendments to the addition of clarifying statements regarding the date, diagnosis, and history, as the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence that the remainder of the record was incomplete, incorrect, or misleading.
Court Disposition
HSE's decision varied and affirmed in part
Orders
- Affirmed HSE's decision to add statements regarding date and diagnosis to the record.
- Directed HSE to add a statement regarding uncertainty of LMP date and gestational age in the history section.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment