Ms X and St James's Hospital [2020] IEIC 61120 (19 May 2020)
The applicant failed to provide sufficient supporting evidence to demonstrate, on the balance of probabilities, that the information in the record was incomplete, incorrect, or misleading. Therefore, the hospital was justified in refusing the amendment application.
- Citation
- [2020] IEIC 61120
- Parties
- Applicant: Ms X; Respondent: St James's Hospital
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Amendment Application / Review by Information Commissioner Under Section 22(2) of the FOI Act
- Outcome
- application refused; hospital's decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Records, Burden of Proof Under FOI, Personal Information, Standard of Proof (balance of Probabilities)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms X
Applicant
St James's Hospital
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Amendment Application / Review by Information Commissioner Under Section 22(2) of the FOI Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated that the information in the hospital record was incomplete, incorrect, or misleading on the balance of probabilities
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide sufficient supporting evidence to demonstrate, on the balance of probabilities, that the information in the record was incomplete, incorrect, or misleading. Therefore, the hospital was justified in refusing the amendment application.
Court Disposition
application refused; hospital's decision affirmed
Orders
- Hospital's refusal to amend the record is affirmed.
- Hospital must attach the applicant's amendment application or a notation to the record as required by section 9(4)(a)(i) of the FOI Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment