Ms X and St. James's Hospital (FOI Act 2014) [2017] IEIC 170213 (15 August 2017)
The Hospital was justified in refusing direct access to the applicant's medical records under section 37(3) of the FOI Act 2014, as there was sufficient evidence that disclosure might be prejudicial to her mental health, well-being or emotional condition. Section 37(4) applies automatically, requiring the offer of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] IEIC 170213
- Parties
- Applicant: Ms X; Respondent: St. James's Hospital
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review
- Outcome
- refusal affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Medical Records, Exemptions Under FOI Act
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms X
Applicant
St. James's Hospital
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Hospital was justified in refusing access to the applicant's medical records under sections 37(3) and 37(4) of the FOI Act 2014
Ratio Decidendi
The Hospital was justified in refusing direct access to the applicant's medical records under section 37(3) of the FOI Act 2014, as there was sufficient evidence that disclosure might be prejudicial to her mental health, well-being or emotional condition. Section 37(4) applies automatically, requiring the offer of access via a health professional. The applicant did not provide evidence to refute the Hospital's position, and the composite nature of the records made partial release impractical and potentially misleading.
Court Disposition
refusal affirmed
Orders
- The decision of St. James's Hospital to refuse access to the applicant's medical records under section 37(3) of the FOI Act is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment