Director of Public Prosecutions -v- M.W. [2017] IECA 175 (01 June 2017)
The Court found the jury was entitled to accept the prosecution evidence, including multiple consistent witness accounts of assault, and rejected the appellant's version as not credible. Alleged disclosure failures did not render the conviction unsafe. The conviction for assault causing harm was upheld.
- Citation
- [2017] IECA 175
- Parties
- Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions; Appellant: MW
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assault Causing Harm, Evidence Disclosure, Jury Verdict, Appeal Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
MW
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for assault causing harm was safe and satisfactory
- 2 Whether failures in evidence disclosure prejudiced the appellant
- 3 Whether the appellant's actions constituted assault causing harm under s.3 of the Non Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the jury was entitled to accept the prosecution evidence, including multiple consistent witness accounts of assault, and rejected the appellant's version as not credible. Alleged disclosure failures did not render the conviction unsafe. The conviction for assault causing harm was upheld.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment