National Asset Loan Management Ltd -v- Barker & ors [2014] IEHC 216 (10 April 2014)

National Asset Loan Management Ltd -v- Barker & ors [2014] IEHC 216 (10 April 2014)

The defendant failed to disclose any arguable defence to the debt claim; the loan agreement expressly incorporated the bank's general terms and conditions, and the assertion that repayment was contingent on the venture's success was unsupported by the contract or evidence. Summary judgment is therefore granted for the amount claimed.

Citation
[2014] IEHC 216
Parties
Plaintiff: National Asset Loan Management Ltd; Defendant: Michael Barker; Defendant: Conor O'Brien; Defendant: Joseph Hannon; Defendant: John Lenihan; Defendant: Martin Fitzpatrick
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
10 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment
Outcome
summary judgment granted for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Loan Agreements, Incorporation of Terms, Defences to Debt Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Asset Loan Management Ltd

Plaintiff

Michael Barker

Defendant

Conor O'Brien

Defendant

Joseph Hannon

Defendant

John Lenihan

Defendant

Martin Fitzpatrick

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment should be granted for the loan amount claimed
  2. 2 Whether the bank's general terms and conditions were incorporated into the loan agreement
  3. 3 Whether the defendant disclosed any arguable defence to the debt claim

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant failed to disclose any arguable defence to the debt claim; the loan agreement expressly incorporated the bank's general terms and conditions, and the assertion that repayment was contingent on the venture's success was unsupported by the contract or evidence. Summary judgment is therefore granted for the amount claimed.

Court Disposition

summary judgment granted for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Summary judgment entered against Michael Barker for €1,249,366.16