Shelley-Morris v. Dublin Bus/Bus Atha Cliath [2003] IESC 2 (22 January 2003)
Plaintiff's deliberate exaggeration of claim is a significant factor; although plaintiff retained partial damages, defendant was more successful on appeal. No order as to costs in Supreme Court due to mixed success and plaintiff's conduct.
- Citation
- [2003] IESC 2
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Siwsan Shelley-Morris; Defendant/appellant: Bus Atha Cliath – Dublin Bus
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Negligence Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal and Costs
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; damages reduced; no order as to costs in Supreme Court.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Costs, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siwsan Shelley-Morris
Plaintiff/respondent
Bus Atha Cliath – Dublin Bus
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Negligence Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 apportionment of contributory negligence
- 2 quantum of damages
- 3 entitlement to costs
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff's deliberate exaggeration of claim is a significant factor; although plaintiff retained partial damages, defendant was more successful on appeal. No order as to costs in Supreme Court due to mixed success and plaintiff's conduct.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; damages reduced; no order as to costs in Supreme Court.
Orders
- Damages reduced to £90,000.00; plaintiff entitled to £45,000.00 after 50% contributory negligence.
- No order as to costs in Supreme Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment