McDonnell & anor -v- Ring & ors [2016] IECA 16 (03 February 2016)

McDonnell & anor -v- Ring & ors [2016] IECA 16 (03 February 2016)

The appellant failed to establish any credible or arguable defence to the claim for repayment under the loan agreements and personal guarantee. Consideration existed in the form of forbearance to sue, and the guarantee was enforceable. Procedural complaints did not demonstrate prejudice or grounds for denying summary judgment.

Citation
[2016] IECA 16
Parties
Plaintiffs/respondents: Bernard McDonnell and Nancy McDonnell; Defendant: Niall Ring; Defendant: Greencastle Investments Limited; Defendant/appellant: Jerry Beades
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
03 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Personal Guarantee, Consideration, Enforceability of Guarantee, Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bernard McDonnell and Nancy McDonnell

Plaintiffs/respondents

Niall Ring

Defendant

Greencastle Investments Limited

Defendant

Jerry Beades

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant had a bona fide defence to summary judgment
  2. 2 Validity and enforceability of the personal guarantee
  3. 3 Existence of consideration for the guarantee

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to establish any credible or arguable defence to the claim for repayment under the loan agreements and personal guarantee. Consideration existed in the form of forbearance to sue, and the guarantee was enforceable. Procedural complaints did not demonstrate prejudice or grounds for denying summary judgment.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Summary judgment for €291,042 plus costs against appellant affirmed
  • Stay on execution for one month from High Court order