De Morais v Minister For Social Protection and Ors (Approved) [2026] IEHC 163 (20 March 2026)
Under Irish law, a person who works without a valid work permit is not employed under a lawful contract of service and is not an 'employee' for the purposes of redundancy payments or social welfare benefits. The Directive allows Member States to define 'employee,' and since Irish law excludes undocumented workers from this definition, there is no conflict with EU law. The applicant, not being in insurable employment, is not entitled to redundancy payments from the State fund.
- Citation
- [2026] IEHC 163
- Parties
- Applicant: Nilton De Morais; First Respondent: Minister for Social Protection; Second Respondent: Ireland and the Attorney General; Third Respondent: Minister for Trade, Enterprise & Employment
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment at High Court
- Outcome
- Reliefs refused; application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy Payments, Undocumented Workers, Insurable Employment, Work Permits, Directive 2008/94/ec, Alternative Remedies, Judicial Review, Interpretation of 'employee', Public Policy, Disapplication of National Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nilton De Morais
Applicant
Minister for Social Protection
First Respondent
Ireland and the Attorney General
Second Respondent
Minister for Trade, Enterprise & Employment
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment at High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an undocumented worker is entitled to redundancy payments from the State fund under Irish law and/or EU Directive 2008/94/EC
- 2 Whether Irish law conflicts with Directive 2008/94/EC regarding the definition of 'employee'
- 3 Whether judicial review is appropriate given the existence of statutory appeal mechanisms
Ratio Decidendi
Under Irish law, a person who works without a valid work permit is not employed under a lawful contract of service and is not an 'employee' for the purposes of redundancy payments or social welfare benefits. The Directive allows Member States to define 'employee,' and since Irish law excludes undocumented workers from this definition, there is no conflict with EU law. The applicant, not being in insurable employment, is not entitled to redundancy payments from the State fund.
Court Disposition
Reliefs refused; application dismissed.
Orders
- Refusal of reliefs sought in the notice of motion dated 14 May 2025 and statement of grounds.
- Parties to furnish written submissions on final order and costs within four weeks.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment