Reflex/Parity Maintenance [1993] IECA 140 (20th October, 1993)
The agreement, as amended to waive the post-employment non-compete restriction, does not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition and therefore does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1993] IECA 140
- Parties
- Purchaser: Reflex Investments plc; Target Company: Parity Maintenance Limited; Vendor: Paul Murphy; Vendor: Thomas Moynagh; Vendor: Arthur Fitzpatrick; Vendor: Alphonsus Waters
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Final Decision
- Outcome
- certificate issued
- Legal Topics
- Non Compete Clause, Mergers and Acquisitions, Agreement Between Undertakings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reflex Investments plc
Purchaser
Parity Maintenance Limited
Target Company
Paul Murphy
Vendor
Thomas Moynagh
Vendor
Arthur Fitzpatrick
Vendor
Alphonsus Waters
Vendor
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the agreement between Reflex Investments plc and the vendors for the acquisition of Parity Maintenance Limited, including the non-compete clause, offends Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement, as amended to waive the post-employment non-compete restriction, does not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition and therefore does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate issued
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement, as amended, does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment