Christopher Terry/Carne Co. Ltd- Peter and Deidre Coyne (Fat Freddy's) [1997] IECA 486 (12th June, 1997)
The non-compete and non-solicitation clauses, as originally drafted, exceeded what was necessary to protect the goodwill of the business and thus offended Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991. However, the purchasers' waiver limiting both restrictions to two years from 6 March 1996 brought the agreement into compliance with the Act.
- Citation
- [1997] IECA 486
- Parties
- Vendor: Christopher Terry; Vendor: Carne Co. Ltd.; Purchaser: Peter Coyne; Purchaser: Deirdre Coyne
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Decision / Final Decision
- Outcome
- certificate issued; agreement as amended does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
- Legal Topics
- Non Compete Clause, Non Solicitation Clause, Business Sale Agreement, Section 4 Competition Act 1991
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Terry
Vendor
Carne Co. Ltd.
Vendor
Peter Coyne
Purchaser
Deirdre Coyne
Purchaser
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Decision / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the non-compete and non-solicitation clauses in the business sale agreement offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Ratio Decidendi
The non-compete and non-solicitation clauses, as originally drafted, exceeded what was necessary to protect the goodwill of the business and thus offended Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991. However, the purchasers' waiver limiting both restrictions to two years from 6 March 1996 brought the agreement into compliance with the Act.
Court Disposition
certificate issued; agreement as amended does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the business sale agreement dated 29 March 1996, as amended by the waiver dated 20 March 1997, does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment