O.G. -v- C.G. [2015] IEHC 775 (04 December 2015)
The court found that the existing access arrangements had operated satisfactorily and that it was illogical to argue that minor extensions would suddenly expose the children to risk. The court determined that the best interests of the children warranted some further access to their father, moving towards a more balanced parenting arrangement, while maintaining safeguards and annual review.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 775
- Parties
- Applicant: O. G.; Respondent: C. G.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Access arrangements amended in favour of the applicant, with a stay on operation until January 2016.
- Legal Topics
- Child Access, Custody, Welfare of Children, Parental Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O. G.
Applicant
C. G.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted increased access to his children
- 2 Whether current access arrangements serve the best interests of the children
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the existing access arrangements had operated satisfactorily and that it was illogical to argue that minor extensions would suddenly expose the children to risk. The court determined that the best interests of the children warranted some further access to their father, moving towards a more balanced parenting arrangement, while maintaining safeguards and annual review.
Court Disposition
Access arrangements amended in favour of the applicant, with a stay on operation until January 2016.
Orders
- First weekend access extended to Friday 6pm to Sunday 8.30pm (or 9.30pm during school holidays)
- Summer holiday access includes Tuesday 6pm to Wednesday 9.30pm and specified week-long blocks
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment