O.S. v O.S. (Child Abduction: Exercise of Custody Rights, Grave Risk, Separation of Siblings, Views of the Child) (Approved) [2023] IEHC 421 (22 June 2023)

O.S. v O.S. (Child Abduction: Exercise of Custody Rights, Grave Risk, Separation of Siblings, Views of the Child) (Approved) [2023] IEHC 421 (22 June 2023)

The applicant mother was exercising custody rights at the time of the children's removal; the respondent failed to establish a grave risk defence or that the English courts could not protect the children; while the children objected to return, their objections did not outweigh the Convention's objectives and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] IEHC 421
Parties
Applicant: O. S.; Respondent: O. S.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
22 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Under Hague Convention / Final Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Return order granted
Legal Topics
Child Abduction, Hague Convention, Custody Rights, Grave Risk Exception, Views of the Child, Separation of Siblings
Family Law International Law Child Abduction Hague Convention Custody Rights Grave Risk Exception Views of the Child Separation of Siblings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

O. S.

Applicant

O. S.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Child Abduction Under Hague Convention / Final Judgment at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was exercising custody rights at the time of removal or retention
  2. 2 Whether the grave risk exception under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention applies
  3. 3 What weight should be given to the objections of the children to return

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant mother was exercising custody rights at the time of the children's removal; the respondent failed to establish a grave risk defence or that the English courts could not protect the children; while the children objected to return, their objections did not outweigh the Convention's objectives and the circumstances of the case. All three children must be returned to England.

Court Disposition

Return order granted

Orders

  • All three children (Esther, Samuel, and Oliva) to be returned to England forthwith.
  • The English courts to continue to address custody and welfare matters.