Oakville Ltd/Tenants of Oakville S. Centre, Clonmel [1993] IECA 260 (15th December, 1993)

Oakville Ltd/Tenants of Oakville S. Centre, Clonmel [1993] IECA 260 (15th December, 1993)

The notified lease agreements, including restrictive and exclusive user clauses, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in goods or services in the State or any part thereof.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1993] IECA 260
Parties
Applicant: Oakville Limited; Respondent: Tenants of Oakville Shopping Centre, Clonmel
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Notification for Certificate or Licence Under Competition Act 1991 / Decision
Outcome
certificate issued
Legal Topics
Shopping Centre Leases, Restrictive Covenants, Exclusive User Clauses
Competition Law Shopping Centre Leases Restrictive Covenants Exclusive User Clauses

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Oakville Limited

Applicant

Tenants of Oakville Shopping Centre, Clonmel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Notification for Certificate or Licence Under Competition Act 1991 / Decision

  1. 1 Whether the lease agreements between Oakville Limited and its tenants offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991

Ratio Decidendi

The notified lease agreements, including restrictive and exclusive user clauses, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in goods or services in the State or any part thereof.

Court Disposition

certificate issued

Orders

  • The Competition Authority certifies that the agreements between Oakville Limited and its tenants do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.