Lowe (A Bankrupt), Re [1988] IEHC 2 (21 September 1988)
The court found that John Lowe was solvent at the time of the transfer, the transaction was made in good faith, and there was valuable consideration. Therefore, the transfer was not void under Section 52 of the Bankruptcy (Ireland) Amendment Act, 1872, and Nora Lowe was entitled to the contents as her sole property.
- Citation
- [1988] IEHC 2
- Parties
- Bankrupt: John Lowe; Bankrupt/applicant: Nora Lowe; Respondent: Official Assignee
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Voidable Settlements, Solvency, Valuable Consideration, Good Faith Transfers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Lowe
Bankrupt
Nora Lowe
Bankrupt/applicant
Official Assignee
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of contents of 27 Lower Baggot Street from John Lowe to Nora Lowe was void under Section 52 of the Bankruptcy (Ireland) Amendment Act, 1872
- 2 Whether John Lowe was solvent at the time of the transfer
- 3 Whether the transfer was made in good faith and for valuable consideration
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that John Lowe was solvent at the time of the transfer, the transaction was made in good faith, and there was valuable consideration. Therefore, the transfer was not void under Section 52 of the Bankruptcy (Ireland) Amendment Act, 1872, and Nora Lowe was entitled to the contents as her sole property.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Declaration that the contents of 27 Lower Baggot Street are the sole property of Nora Lowe.
- John Lowe and the Official Assignee have no estate or interest in the said contents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment