Kearney v McQuillan & Anor [2006] IEHC 186 (31 May 2006)

Kearney v McQuillan & Anor [2006] IEHC 186 (31 May 2006)

The delay of over thirty-five years, combined with the death of all key medical witnesses and loss of records, has caused such prejudice to the first named defendant that a fair trial is not possible. The defendant did not contribute to the delay. The interests of justice require dismissal of the action.

Citation
[2006] IEHC 186
Parties
Plaintiff: Olivia Kearney; First Named Defendant: Ethna McQuillan; Second Named Defendant: North Eastern Health Board
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
31 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Medical Negligence Civil Action / Application to Dismiss for Inordinate and Inexcusable Delay/preliminary Issue
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim against the first named defendant dismissed for inordinate and inexcusable delay causing prejudice and risk of unfair trial.
Legal Topics
Inordinate and Inexcusable Delay, Estoppel, Prejudice to Fair Trial, Medical Consent, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Tort Law Medical Negligence Civil Procedure Inordinate and Inexcusable Delay Estoppel Prejudice to Fair Trial Medical Consent Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Olivia Kearney

Plaintiff

Ethna McQuillan

First Named Defendant

North Eastern Health Board

Second Named Defendant

Procedural Posture

Medical Negligence Civil Action / Application to Dismiss for Inordinate and Inexcusable Delay/preliminary Issue

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is estopped from proceeding due to inordinate and inexcusable delay
  2. 2 Whether the delay has caused prejudice to the defendant such that a fair trial is not possible
  3. 3 Whether the defendant contributed to the delay

Ratio Decidendi

The delay of over thirty-five years, combined with the death of all key medical witnesses and loss of records, has caused such prejudice to the first named defendant that a fair trial is not possible. The defendant did not contribute to the delay. The interests of justice require dismissal of the action.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim against the first named defendant dismissed for inordinate and inexcusable delay causing prejudice and risk of unfair trial.

Orders

  • Action against the first named defendant is dismissed.